Freud - Fraud?
| Freudian Inventory Results |
personality tests by similarminds.com
X X X
Today's Modern Southeast Asia tutorial was horrible. I was one of a pathetic two Asians, and the only Singaporean in a whole class of 13 people. And guess what topic we were doing today?
Singapore's merger with, and separation from, Malaya/Malaysia.
Which, of course, we did not touch on eventually (it's a Melbourne Uni HISTORY department thing, I've come to realise). Instead, it was a me-in-the-hot-seat bombing session - with questions about Singapore and Singapore's government, and the Singapore community - all targeted at ... who else?
The thing was, I naively thought I already knew what was going to come, so I read my readings beforehand, all geared up for questions that my class was to ask me regarding Singapore's history, BUT.
"I have a question about what it means about yellow culture and its links with prostitution in Singapore."
"What does the Singaporean government do about unemployment?"
"Do Singaporeans use the various campaigns like "Speak Mandarin" and "Speak Proper English" and Courtesy campaigns as some sort of a national joke against the government?
"Why does Singapore need a Speak Mandarin campaign? You mean like, as opposed to speaking in English?"
"What language of instruction is used in Singapore schools?"
And finally, the grand finale (it was, coincidentally, the last question of the tutorial as well), which I totally bummed at. It was literally a jaw-drop.
"You know how Australia sees itself as a "Big Brother" sort of country. As a Singaporean living in Australia now, how would you compare this with Singapore's situation, and how do you get accustomed to this - like whether you are ahead, behind, on par with, etc? No, and I do not mean this as a racist comment ... considering that you come from a country with a sort of hierarchical organised structure which emphasizes so much on discipline?"
Imagine thinking of a proper response to this in 3 seconds. Like what my group of friends always say, KEE SIAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -_-
Perrin, where were you when I needed you most?
X X X
I am once again reminded of the fact that although the Singaporean education system is known to be very "high up there" in the Asia-Pacific region, the quality of students we produce is another issue altogether. Sure, feed us all the facts and we puke them all out in the exam. We score the As and Bs; we grab the distinctions, but is that what solely defines the term "academically inclined"?
Not that I'm searching for a convenient excuse to explain my inability to rattle away with intelligent responses in tutorials - but isn't this the case with most of us Singaporeans? From primary school to JC, most of my teachers (in desperation) had to peer through our class list more often than not, just to find a particular someone to respond to questions (does this happen in Aussie schools or not I am not very sure, but I suppose the possibility is quite low). I quote my Sec 3 form teacher, "You all are just like chee hum" (she actually meant "see hum" as in "cockle", but she wasn't a very cheena person, so...)
Which is why, even at age 21 and at university level, I find myself still not confident enough to contribute to class discussions. I sometimes even feel like I don't have any thoughts about the readings I just read (whereas the Aussies have no qualms about firing away with their opinions). It is definitely not just a language/culture difference; the problem lies with us being trapped within the vicious cycle of spoonfeeding and regurgitating, all the way from age 7-18. We aren't trained to think critically, or even oppose certain views. By the time it's realised that, "Oh! We really should create opportunities for Singaporean students to exercise their creativity and thinking skills you know...", it is often too late - we enjoyed the comfort zone we were brought up in, so why should we accept something new now? Creativity? Critical thinking? Bah!!"
After 2 years at an overseas uni, I ashamedly realise that it is the same situation everywhere - Singaporeans remain pretty much a passive lot in class (except maybe when participation marks are at stake ;p). To excel in an increasingly globalised economy, a certificate with brilliant grades mightn't be quite enough anymore - what is in fact valuable ... lies within the unseen.
So I say, throw the term "good student" (ie: one who works hard and gets good results) back to the 90s. The "21st century student" is no longer just someone who can successfully regurgitate what's been taught to him in school, but who also possesses skills of thought, expression, and analysis. Our education system gave us the foundation, and it is now up to us to build on that.
The University of Melbourne holds a ranking of 9th in the Asia-Pacific region - a reputation to be proud of. I am, however, hovering at the bottom of the cohort, perhaps not in terms of academic results, but in many other aspects which are so very essential to my future working life ... and yet not assessed.
I say it like I recite my ABCs - but really, how do we actually go about transforming ourselves into the supposedly all-rounded "21st century student"?
Oh, look what you've done
You've made a fool of everyone.
JET - Look What You've Done.
